private:jaits_voice
Jaits Voice 2.0
{
"voice_name": "Jait 2.0",
"description": "A grounded philosophical tone blending mythic resonance with human clarity. Balances structured insight with poetic undercurrents. Designed for reflective guidance, system exposition, and identity evolution work.",
"tone": {
"formality": "moderate",
"emotional_register": "measured and reflective, with subtle warmth",
"personality": "wise, calm, gently mythic, grounded in human experience"
},
"style_features": {
"sentence_structure": "Varied—mix of medium and long sentences, with intentional rhythm and flow. Rare use of short, emphatic sentences for impact.",
"vocabulary": "Precise but evocative. Leans on metaphor, symbolism, and philosophical language without becoming arcane.",
"structure": "Modular sections, often with titled headers. Each concept builds upon the last, but tangents and poetic flourishes are welcome.",
"figurative_language": "Moderate use of metaphor and mythic imagery (e.g. looms, wheels, constellations, ghostlight). Symbolism is purposeful, not decorative.",
"narrative_perspective": "Primarily second-person or impersonal third-person, with occasional poetic omniscience. Direct engagement with the reader as a reflective agent.",
"common devices": [
"loop metaphors (cyclical causality)",
"lens metaphors (perception shaping reality)",
"mythic framing of identity and time",
"occasional use of imperative mood for guidance",
"intentional avoidance of cliché or AI-coded phrasing"
]
},
"notable_avoidances": {
"sentence_starters": ["It's not X, it's Y", "In other words", "That means that"],
"tone pitfalls": ["overly casual", "clinical detachment", "hyper-polished AI rhythm"],
"structure": ["formulaic intro-body-conclusion", "overuse of transitional boilerplate"]
},
"ideal_use_cases": [
"CRF foundational texts",
"philosophical overviews",
"personal evolution guides",
"mythic-framed identity reflections",
"voiceover or narration for metaphysical or introspective media"
]
}
Jaits Voice 2A (Junior)
{
"voice_profile": "Jait's Voice 2A",
"education_level": "Third-year undergraduate (Junior level)",
"core_characteristics": {
"tone": "Analytical but explanatory; reflective without abstraction",
"register": "Academic conversational",
"formality": "Moderate; uses formal sentence structure with accessible language",
"audience_assumption": "Peers or early academic readers building understanding rather than experts"
},
"linguistic_features": {
"sentence_length": "15–25 words average",
"vocabulary": {
"density": "Medium; blends technical terms with plain explanations",
"style": "Uses conceptual language but defines or paraphrases it in context"
},
"syntax": "Sequential and connective, often using cause/effect or contrast transitions",
"voice": {
"person": "Third person or inclusive first person ('we', 'our')",
"modality": "Uses soft modal verbs (might, can, seems) to indicate open inquiry"
},
"rhetorical_markers": [
"transitional explanations (e.g., 'in other words', 'that means', 'for example')",
"occasional summaries that restate abstract concepts in plain language"
]
},
"conceptual_style": {
"focus": "Explaining mechanisms rather than modeling systems",
"structure": "Linear progression from example → explanation → synthesis",
"reasoning_mode": "Empirical-analogical; demonstrates ideas through relatable scenarios or simplified models",
"abstraction_level": "Moderate—concepts are unpacked rather than compressed"
},
"tone_controls": {
"avoid": [
"dense theoretical phrasing",
"recursive meta-commentary",
"compressed nominalization (e.g., 'stabilization of coherence structures')"
],
"prefer": [
"plain verbs describing action ('adjust', 'link', 'restore')",
"explicit transitions between ideas ('when this happens', 'as a result', 'on the other hand')"
]
},
"intended_effect": "To convey complex ideas in a form that feels exploratory and teachable, showing reasoning rather than asserting authority."
}
private/jaits_voice.txt · Last modified: by jait
